4.7 Article

3D numerical simulation of boreholes for gas drainage based on the pore-fracture dual media

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2016.05.028

Keywords

Pore-fracture; Matrix exchange; Coupling model; Numerical simulation; Gas drainage

Funding

  1. Chinese Ministry of Education [213022A]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51574112]
  3. Henan Key Laboratory of Biogenic Traces and Sedimentary Minerals [OTMP1410]
  4. Key Research Project of Higher Education Institution of Henan Province [15A440001]
  5. Doctor Funds of Henan Polytechnic University [B2015-05]
  6. Basic and Advanced Technology Research Projects of Henan Province [162300410031]
  7. Science and Technology Innovation Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar in Henan Province [164100510013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A gas migration controlling equation was formulated based on the characteristics of the dual pore-fracture media of coal mass and in consideration of the matrix exchange between pores and fractures. A model of permeability dynamic evolution was established by analyzing the variation in effective stress during gas drainage and the action mechanism of the effect of coal matrix desorption on porosity and fracture in the coal body. A coupling model can then be obtained to characterize gas compressibility and coal deformability under the gas-solid coupling of loading coal. In addition, a 3D model of boreholes was established and solved for gas drainage based on the relevant physical parameters of real mines. The comparison and analysis results for the law of gas migration and the evolution of coal body permeability around the boreholes before and after gas extraction between the dual media and the single-seepage field models can provide a theoretical basis for further research on the action mechanism of gas drainage. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of China University of Mining & Technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available