4.2 Article

Ocular biometric changes with different accommodative stimuli using swept-source optical coherence tomography

Journal

INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 303-310

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-017-0813-y

Keywords

Ocular biometry; Accommodation; Cataract; Optical biometer

Categories

Funding

  1. Spanish Government Grant Explora [SAF2013-49284-EXP]
  2. Formacion de Profesorado Universitario'' Grant (Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte) [FPU13/05332]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo evaluate ocular biometric changes with different accommodative stimuli using a new swept-source optical biometer.MethodsOnly the right eye was analyzed. Each subject was measured six times with the IOLMaster 700 swept-source optical biometer (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) with the subject looking at the stimulus shown by the instrument and with the subject looking at a target placed outside the instrument at 0D of vergence. Axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), lens thickness (LT), white-to-white (WTW), and keratometry readings (K1 and K2) were evaluated in both cases. To assess if the changes found may affect the intraocular (IOL) power calculation for surgical applications, we have applied some formulae, using the software provided by the optical biometer manufacturer, to the ocular parameters found in both situations for three different types of IOLs.ResultsNo statistically significant differences were found for AL, CCT, WTW, K1 and K2 between the subject looking at the stimulus of the biometer and looking at the outside target at 0D of vergence (p>0.05). However, the measurement of ACD revealed a statistically significant reduction of 20 microns (p=0.03) and, on the contrary, LT increased significantly 30 microns (p=0.02). ACD and LT changes were highly correlated (R-2=0.91). As for the IOL power calculation, in all cases, the mean change was lower than 0.25 D both for IOL power selection and residual refraction.ConclusionsAlthough ACD and LT change significantly with different accommodative stimuli measured by swept-source optical biometry, these changes are not clinically relevant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available