4.6 Article

Energy-Saving Offloading by Jointly Allocating Radio and Computational Resources for Mobile Edge Computing

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages 11255-11268

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2710056

Keywords

Mobile edge computing; computation offloading; energy minimization; branch-and-bound method; reformulation-linearization-technique; Gini coefficient

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61471060]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project [2017ZX03001003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mobile edge computing (MEC) providing information technology and cloud-computing capabilities within the radio access network is an emerging technique in fifth-generation networks. MEC can extend the computational capacity of smart mobile devices (SMDs) and economize SMDs' energy consumption by migrating the computation-intensive task to the MEC server. In this paper, we consider a multi-mobile-users MEC system, where multiple SMDs ask for computation offloading to a MEC server. In order to minimize the energy consumption on SMDs, we jointly optimize the offloading selection, radio resource allocation, and computational resource allocation coordinately. We formulate the energy consumption minimization problem as a mixed interger nonlinear programming (MINLP) problem, which is subject to specific application latency constraints. In order to solve the problem, we propose a reformulation linearization-technique-based Branch-and-Bound (RLTBB) method, which can obtain the optimal result or a suboptimal result by setting the solving accuracy. Considering the complexity of RTLBB cannot be guaranteed, we further design a Gini coefficient-based greedy heuristic (GCGH) to solve the MINLP problem in polynomial complexity by degrading the MINLP problem into the convex problem. Many simulation results demonstrate the energy saving enhancements of RLTBB and GCGH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available