4.6 Article

Incentive-Compatible Packet Forwarding in Mobile Social Networks via Evolutionary Game Theory

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages 13557-13569

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2689775

Keywords

Selfishness; evolutionary game theory; multiple-copy packet forwarding protocol

Funding

  1. NRF of Korea (MSIP-) [NRF-2014K1A3A1A20034987]
  2. NSF of China [61471287]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the absence of end-to-end paths and without the knowledge of the whole network, packet forwarding, including forwarding decision (i.e., forwarding or dropping the packet) and relaying selection, is crucial to be made by the individual of the node based on the packet-forwarding protocol in autonomous mobile social networks (MSNs). In this paper, we investigate the adaptive packet forwarding in MSNs afflicted with potential selfish nodes. When considering the various selfish behaviors of network nodes in multi-hop MSNs, an incentive compatible multiple-copy packet forwarding (ICMPF) protocol is proposed to maintain a satisfied packet delivery probability while reducing the delivery overhead. Considering the fact that the node's forwarding decision in the ICMPF protocol is affected by its available resources (i.e., bandwidth and location privacy) and network environment (i.e., other nodes' actions and social ties), an evolutionary game framework is exploited for modeling the complicated interactions among nodes to guide their forwarding behaviors. Meanwhile, we portray the forwarding behavior dynamics and develop the evolutionary stable strategy (ESS) for this game-theoretic framework. Then, we prove that the strategy dynamics converge to the ESS and further develop a distributed learning algorithm for nodes to approach to the ESS. Simulation results show that our system converges to the ESS and also is robust to the learning error induced by the communication noise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available