4.5 Article

Experimental Validation of Motor Primitive-Based Control for Leg Exoskeletons during Continuous Multi-Locomotion Tasks

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROROBOTICS
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages 1-17

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2017.00015

Keywords

bio-inspired; primitives; control; exoskeleton; orthosis

Funding

  1. EU [FP7ICT-2011-2.1, 287894, H2020-ICT-2016-1, 731931]
  2. Fondazione Pisa within the IUVO project [154/11]
  3. Belgian F.R.S.-FNRS [6809010]
  4. Slovenian Research Agency [P2-0228]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An emerging approach to design locomotion assistive devices deals with reproducing desirable biological principles of human locomotion. In this paper, we present a bio-inspired controller for locomotion assistive devices based on the concept of motor primitives. The weighted combination of artificial primitives results in a set of virtual muscle stimulations. These stimulations then activate a virtual musculoskeletal model producing reference assistive torque profiles for different locomotion tasks (i.e., walking, ascending stairs, and descending stairs). The paper reports the validation of the controller through a set of experiments conducted with healthy participants. The proposed controller was tested for the first time with a unilateral leg exoskeleton assisting hip, knee, and ankle joints by delivering a fraction of the computed reference torques. Importantly, subjects performed a track involving ground-level walking, ascending stairs, and descending stairs and several transitions between these tasks. These experiments highlighted the capability of the controller to provide relevant assistive torques and to effectively handle transitions between the tasks. Subjects displayed a natural interaction with the device. Moreover, they significantly decreased the time needed to complete the track when the assistance was provided, as compared to wearing the device with no assistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available