4.8 Article

Identification of a Predominantly Interferon-λ-Induced Transcriptional Profile in Murine Intestinal Epithelial Cells

Journal

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01302

Keywords

interferon-lambda; intestinal epithelium; interleukin 28 receptor; transcription; gastrointestinal tract

Categories

Funding

  1. BMBF (e: Bio) [0316170T]
  2. Collaborative Research Center (Chronic Infection: Microbial Persistence) [SFB900]
  3. European Research Training Group [1273]
  4. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  5. Hannover Biomedical Research School
  6. Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research Graduate School
  7. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Ho-2236/12-1, Ho-2236/8-1, Ho-2236/14-1, 1656, 1580]
  8. Helmholtz-Alberta Initiative, Infectious Diseases Research [HAI-IDRSO-073]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Type I (alpha and beta) and type III (lambda) interferons (IFNs) induce the expression of a large set of antiviral effector molecules via their respective surface membrane receptors. Whereas most cell types respond to type I IFN, type III IFN preferentially acts on epithelial cells and protects mucosal organs such as the lung and gastrointestinal tract. Despite the engagement of different receptor molecules, the type I and type III IFN-induced signaling cascade and upregulated gene profile is thought to be largely identical. Here, we comparatively analyzed the response of gut epithelial cells to IFN-beta and IFN-lambda(2) and identified a set of genes predominantly induced by IFN-lambda(2). We confirm the influence of epithelial cell polarization for enhanced type III receptor expression and demonstrate the induction of predominantly IFN-lambda(2)-induced genes in the gut epithelium in vivo. Our results suggest that IFN-lambda(2) targets the epithelium and induces genes to adjust the antiviral host response to the requirements at mucosal body sites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available