4.7 Article

Berberine Suppresses Cyclin D1 Expression through Proteasomal Degradation in Human Hepatoma Cells

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms17111899

Keywords

berberine; Cyclin D1; ubiquitinated-dependent proteolysis; beta-TrCP; tumor growth inhibition

Funding

  1. research council of the University of Hong Kong [104001764, 10400699, 104002320, 104002889, 104003422]
  2. Wong's Donation on Modern Oncology of Chinese Medicine [200006276]
  3. Gala Family Trust [200007008]
  4. Government-Matching Grant Scheme [207060411]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81302808]
  6. Open Project of Hubei Key Laboratory of Wudang Local Chinese Medicine Research, Hubei University of Medicine [WDCM001]
  7. Young Scientist Innovation Team Project of Hubei Colleges [T201510]
  8. Research Grant Committee (RGC) of Hong Kong SAR of China (RGC General Research Fund) [766211]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study is to explore the underlying mechanism on berberine-induced Cyclin D1 degradation in human hepatic carcinoma. We observed that berberine could suppress both in vitro and in vivo expression of Cyclin D1 in hepatoma cells. Berberine exhibits dose-and time-dependent inhibition on Cyclin D1 expression in human hepatoma cell HepG2. Berberine increases the phosphorylation of Cyclin D1 at Thr286 site and potentiates Cyclin D1 nuclear export to cytoplasm for proteasomal degradation. In addition, berberine recruits the Skp, Cullin, F-box containing complex-beta-Transducin Repeat Containing Protein (SCF beta-TrCP) complex to facilitate Cyclin D1 ubiquitin-proteasome dependent proteolysis. Knockdown of beta-TrCP blocks Cyclin D1 turnover induced by berberine; blocking the protein degradation induced by berberine in HepG2 cells increases tumor cell resistance to berberine. Our results shed light on berberine's potential as an anti-tumor agent for clinical cancer therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available