4.7 Article

Loss of Phospholipid Membrane Integrity Induced by Two-Dimensional Nanomaterials

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 4, Issue 10, Pages 404-409

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00358

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation through the Engineering Recearch Center for Nanotechnology Enabled Water Treatment [ERC-1449500]
  2. YIBS Postdoctoral Fellowship
  3. Tel Aviv University Presidential Postdoctoral Fellowship
  4. Army Research Laboratory (QRO) [64935, W911NF1410564]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interaction of two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterials with biological membranes has important implications for ecotoxicity and human health. In this study, we use a dye-leakage assay to quantitatively assess the disruption of a model phospholipid bilayer membrane (i.e., lipid vesicles) by five emerging 2D nanomaterials: graphene oxide (GO), reduced graphene oxide (rGO), molybdenum disulfide (MoS2), copper oxide (CuO), and iron oxide (alpha-Fe2O3). Leakage of dye from the vesicle inner solution, which indicates loss of membrane integrity, was observed for GO, rGO, and MoS2 nanosheets but not for CuO and alpha-Fe2O3, implying that 2D morphology by itself is not sufficient to cause loss of membrane integrity. Mixing GO and rGO with lipid vesicles induced aggregation, whereas enhanced stability (dispersion) was observed with MoS2 nanosheets, suggesting different. aggregation mechanisms for the 2D nanomaterials upon interaction with lipid bilayers. No loss of membrane integrity was observed under strong oxidative conditions, indicating that nanosheet-driven membrane disruption stemmed from a physical mechanism rather than chemical oxidation. For GO, the most disruptive nanomaterial, we show that the extent of membrane integrity loss was dependent on total surface area, not edge length, which is consistent with a lipid-extraction mechanism and inconsistent with a piercing mechanism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available