4.7 Article

Atmospheric Mercury Temporal Trends in the Northeastern United States from 1992 to 2014: Are Measured Concentrations Responding to Decreasing Regional Emissions?

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 91-97

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00452

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority [26578]
  2. National Science Foundation [02167]
  3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EP08H000271, EP10H000343]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Long-term atmospheric mercury measurements at Underhill, VT (VT99),' and Huntington Forest, NY (NY20), from 1992 to 2014 and 2005 to 2014, respectively, were used to determine concentration trends using Mann Kendall's tau test with Sen's slope estimator. These data, measured generally downwind of large Hg sources in the Midwestern United States, provide the longest record of ambient Hg concentrations available in the United States. At VT99, concentrations of gaseous element mercury (GEM), gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM), and particle-bound mercury (PBM) declined at rates of -1.8, -3.2, and -6.7%/year, respectively. At NY20, GEM and GOM concentrations declined at rates of -1.6 and -7.8%/year, respectively; however, PBM concentrations increased at a rate of 2.0%/year, which is likely related to winter wood burning. A trajectory ensemble analysis using the potential source contribution function indicates the source locations associated with high mercury concentrations changed from Toronto Buffalo and Pennsylvania areas to east coast urban centers. The declining GEM concentrations in the northeastern United States are positively correlated with decreasing SO2 emissions in the upwind area. Overall, the results indicate that decreased mercury concentrations measured during the past decade are consistent with decreased Hg emissions from regional point sources and that increasing global emissions have not overwhelmed those decreases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available