4.0 Article

Seeing the Wood for the Trees: Recent Advances in the Reconstruction of Woodland in Archaeological Landscapes Using Pollen Data

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL ARCHAEOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 228-239

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14614103.2017.1377405

Keywords

Cultural landscapes; environmental archaeology; Multiple Scenario Approach; palynology; simulation; woodland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reviews recent advances in the reconstruction of woodland cover from palynological data. Pollen sequences record the vegetation cover of past landscapes, but translating a pollen diagram into a landscape reconstruction is not straightforward. This paper focuses on the use of pollen records to address three archaeologically relevant problems, the detection of woodland presence and extent in a largely open landscape, the reconstruction of the habitat context of a specific archaeological site, and the detection of woodland management. Research seeking to quantify past land-cover using models of pollen dispersal and deposition has led to the development of algorithms and computer software linking maps of the arrangement of land-cover with simulated pollen records at possible coring points. This software can be used to carry out thought experiments and test competing hypotheses, and also underpins the Multiple Scenario Approach to the reconstruction of past land-cover. Modern datasets of pollen surface samples and associated vegetation abundances are needed to calibrate these models, and can also provide insights into how the pollen record sees' landscapes, and therefore aid interpretation of past pollen records. We demonstrate how simulation approaches and surface sample studies are improving the scientific basis of reconstruction of past landscapes, and how these approaches offer new opportunities for communication and collaboration between archaeologists and environmental specialists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available