4.6 Article

Comparative Interrelationship of the Structural, Nonlinear-Optical and Other Acentric Properties for Oxide, Borate and Carbonate Crystals

Journal

CRYSTALS
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cryst7040109

Keywords

structure; property; bond length; relationship; oxide; borate; carbonate crystals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The structure and the maximal nonlinear optical (NLO) susceptibility chi((2)) are tabulated for more 700 acentric binary oxides, 220 crystals of simple, binary and complex borates and for the same set of 110 carbonates, tartrates, formates, oxalates, acetates and fluoride-carbonates used in ultraviolet and deep ultraviolet optoelectronics. According to the chemical formula, the structural symbols of these crystals have been plotted on the plane of two minimal oxide bond lengths (OBL). It is shown that acentric crystals are positioned on such plane inside the vertical, horizontal and slope intersected ellipses of acentricity. The oxide and borate crystals with moderate NLO susceptibility are found in the central parts of these ellipses intersection and, with low susceptibility, on top, at the bottom and border of the ellipses rosette. The nonpolar fluoride-carbonate crystals with high NLO susceptibility are found in the curve-side rhombic parts of the slope ellipse of acentricity. The unmonotonous fuzzy dependence chi((2)) on the OBL of these crystals is observed, and their clear-cut taxonomy on compounds with pi- or sigma-oxide bonds is also established. It is shown that the correlations of chi((2)) with other acentric properties are nonlinear for the whole set of the oxide crystals having their clear maximum at a certain value of the piezoelectric or electro-optic coefficient. The correlation hardness-thermoconductivity-fusibility is plotted for oxide crystals, part of which is used at the creation of self-frequency-doubling solid state lasers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available