4.6 Article

Three-dimensionally microporous and highly biocompatible bacterial cellulose-gelatin composite scaffolds for tissue engineering applications

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 6, Issue 112, Pages 110840-110849

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra18847h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Korea [NRF-2014-R1A1A2055756]
  2. BK21 plus, Korea [21A.2013-1800001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the current study, highly porous and biocompatible regenerated bacterial cellulose-gelatin (rBC-G) composite scaffolds were fabricated for tissue engineering applications. The scaffolds were prepared from porogen added composite solution of BC-G using a casting and leaching approach. The structural characterization of the scaffolds was carried out through field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). FE-SEM images showed the presence and interconnectivity of pores, while FT-IR and XPS spectra confirmed the composite chemistry of the scaffolds. The observed high porosity and rapid swelling of the scaffolds ensure their nutrient exchange ability during practical applications. In vitro biological tests showed that animal fibroblast cells (NIH 3T3) adhered to and proliferated well on the rBC-G composite scaffolds. Cell penetration assessed by Confocal microscopy indicated up to 200 mu m infiltration after 7 days of incubation, suggesting the suitability of the scaffolds for three-dimensional cell culture. The enhanced expression of metalloproteases (MMPs) showed that prolonged cell incubation can lead to extracellular matrix (ECM) production inside the 3D rBC-G scaffolds. These results demonstrated that our 3D rBC-G composite scaffolds are candidates for future biomedical applications, including tissue regeneration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available