4.8 Article

Catalytic Effects in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: Promoted Sulfur Transformation and Reduced Shuttle Effect

Journal

ADVANCED SCIENCE
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201700270

Keywords

catalytic effect; confinement; Li-S batteries; shuttle effect

Funding

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars, China [51525204]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2014CB932400]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1401243, U1601206]
  4. Shenzhen Basic Research Project [JCYJ20150529164918734]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) battery has emerged as one of the most promising next-generation energy-storage systems. However, the shuttle effect greatly reduces the battery cycle life and sulfur utilization, which is great deterrent to its practical use. This paper reviews the tremendous efforts that are made to find a remedy for this problem, mostly through physical or chemical confinement of the lithium polysulfides (LiPSs). Intrinsically, this confinement has a relatively limited effect on improving the battery performance because in most cases, the LiPSs are passively blocked and cannot be reused. Thus, this strategy becomes less effective with a high sulfur loading and ultralong cycling. A more positive method that not only traps but also increases the subsequent conversion of LiPSs back to lithium sulfides is urgently needed to fundamentally solve the shuttle effect. Here, recent advances on catalytic effects in increasing the rate of conversion of soluble long-chain LiPSs to insoluble short-chain Li2S2/Li2S, and vice versa, are reviewed, and the roles of noble metals, metal oxides, metal sulfides, metal nitrides, and some metal-free materials in this process are highlighted. Challenges and potential solutions for the design of catalytic cathodes and interlayers in Li-S battery are discussed in detail.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available