4.8 Article

Titania-Coated Gold Nano-Bipyramids for Blocking Autophagy Flux and Sensitizing Cancer Cells to Proteasome Inhibitor-Induced Death

Journal

ADVANCED SCIENCE
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201700585

Keywords

autophagy inhibition; bortezomib; cathepsin B; gold nano-bipyramids; titanium dioxide

Funding

  1. Macau Science and Technology Development Fund [014/2014/A1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Targeting protein degradation is recognized as a valid approach to cancer therapy. The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and the autophagy-lysosome pathway are two major pathways for intracellular protein degradation. Proteasome inhibitors such as bortezomib are clinically approved for treating malignancies, but to date, they are still unsatisfactory for cancer therapy. This study identifies titania-coated gold nano-bipyramid (NBP/TiO2) nanostructures as an autophagic flux inhibitor, as the smallest NBP/TiO2 nanostructures induce significant autophagosome accumulation in human glioblastoma U-87 MG cells via blocking the autophagosome-lysosome fusion process and inhibiting lysosomal degradation. Further study indicates that NBP/TiO2 nanostructures reduce the intracellular level of mature cathepsin B and directly inhibit the proteolytic activity of cathepsin B, thereby further inhibiting trypsin-like proteolytic activity, which is a potential cotarget for UPS inhibition. NBP/TiO2 nanostructures interact synergistically with bortezomib to suppress the viability of U-87 MG cells, as the combined treatment synergistically induces the intracellular accumulation of ubiquitinated protein and endoplasmic reticulum stress. In addition, photothermal therapy further synergistically reduces the cell viability. In summary, this study suggests that NBP/TiO2 nanostructures function as a promising anticancer agent in combination with proteasome inhibitors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available