4.7 Article

TRACING INFALL AND ROTATION ALONG THE OUTFLOW CAVITY WALLS OF THE L483 PROTOSTELLAR ENVELOPE

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 833, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/55

Keywords

stars: protostars

Funding

  1. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [HKU 703512P]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H07086] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Single-dish observations in CS(7-6) reveal emission extending out to thousands of au along the outflow axis of low-mass protostars and having a velocity gradient in the opposite direction to that of their outflows. This emission has been attributed to dense and warm gas flowing outward along the walls of bipolar outflow cavities. Here, we present combined single-dish and interferometric CS(7-6) maps for the low-mass protostar L483, revealing a newly discovered compact central component (radius less than or similar to 800 au) and previously unknown features in its extended component (visible out to similar to 4000 au). The velocity gradient and skewed (toward the redshifted side) brightness distribution of the extended component are detectable out to a radius of similar to 2000 au, but not beyond. The compact central component exhibits a velocity gradient in the same direction as, but which is steeper than that of, the extended component. Furthermore, both components exhibit a velocity gradient with an approximately constant magnitude across the outflow axis, apparent in the extended component not just through but also away from the center out to 2000 au. We point out contradictions between our results and model predictions for outflowing gas and propose a new model in which all of the aforementioned emission can be qualitatively explained by gas inflowing along the outflow cavity walls of a rigidly rotating envelope. Our model also can explain the extended CS(7-6) emission observed around other low-mass protostars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available