4.7 Article

STATISTICAL TESTS OF GALACTIC DYNAMO THEORY

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 833, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/43

Keywords

dynamo; galaxies: ISM; galaxies: magnetic fields; galaxies: spiral; magnetic fields magnetohydrodynamics (MHD)

Funding

  1. Leverhulme Trust [RPG-2014-427]
  2. STFC [ST/N000900/1, 2]
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/N000900/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. STFC [ST/N000900/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mean-field galactic dynamo theory is the leading theory to explain the prevalence of regular magnetic fields in spiral galaxies, but its systematic comparison with observations is still incomplete and fragmentary. Here we compare predictions of mean-field dynamo models to observational data on magnetic pitch angle and the strength of the mean magnetic field. We demonstrate that a standard alpha(2)Omega dynamo model produces pitch angles of the regular magnetic fields of nearby galaxies that are reasonably consistent with available data. The dynamo estimates of the magnetic field strength are generally within a factor of a few of the observational values. Reasonable agreement between theoretical and observed pitch angles generally requires the turbulent correlation time tau to be in the range of. 10-20 Myr, in agreement with standard estimates. Moreover, good agreement also requires that the ratio of the ionized gas scale height to root-mean-square turbulent velocity increases with radius. Our results thus widen the possibilities to constrain interstellar medium parameters using observations of magnetic fields. This work is a step toward systematic statistical tests of galactic dynamo theory. Such studies are becoming more and more feasible as larger data sets are acquired using current and up-and-coming instruments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available