Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Multiple comparisons: a tutorial. Part 1. Understanding hypothesis testing
Michael T. Lawson et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2021)
Meta-assessment of bias in science
Daniele Fanelli et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2017)
Reproducibility in Cancer Biology: Making sense of replications
Brian A. Nosek et al.
ELIFE (2017)
Is Most Published Research Really False?
Jeffrey T. Leek et al.
ANNUAL REVIEW OF STATISTICS AND ITS APPLICATION, VOL 4 (2017)
Most of the time, P is an unreliable marker, so we need no exact cut-off
G. B. Drummond
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA (2016)
Underappreciated problems of low replication in ecological field studies
Nathan P. Lemoine et al.
ECOLOGY (2016)
Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations
Sander Greenland et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)
Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015
David Chavalarias et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2016)
Rejection odds and rejection ratios: A proposal for statistical practice in testing hypotheses
M. J. Bayarri et al.
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY (2016)
Blinding Us to the Obvious? The Effect of Statistical Training on the Evaluation of Evidence
Blakeley B. McShane et al.
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE (2016)
IS THERE A REPRODUCIBILITY CRISIS?
Monya Baker
NATURE (2016)
Confidence intervals are no salvation from the alleged fickleness of the P value
Jacques van Helden
NATURE METHODS (2016)
What does research reproducibility mean?
Steven N. Goodman et al.
SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE (2016)
Transparency in Ecology and Evolution: Real Problems, Real Solutions
Timothy H. Parker et al.
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION (2016)
Current Incentives for Scientists Lead to Underpowered Studies with Erroneous Conclusions
Andrew D. Higginson et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2016)
Problems in using p-curve analysis and text-mining to detect rate of p-hacking and evidential value
Dorothy V. M. Bishop et al.
PEERJ (2016)
The natural selection of bad science
Paul E. Smaldino et al.
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2016)
Obtaining evidence by a single well-powered trial or several modestly powered trials
Joanna IntHout et al.
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH (2016)
Marginally Significant Effects as Evidence for Hypotheses: Changing Attitudes Over Four Decades
Laura Pritschet et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2016)
Damaging Real Lives Through Obstinacy: Re-Emphasising Why Significance Testing is Wrong
Stephen Gorard
SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ONLINE (2016)
Misconceptions of the p-value among Chilean and Italian Academic Psychologists
Laura Badenes-Ribera et al.
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY (2016)
Conceptualizing and evaluating the replication of research results
Leandre R. Fabrigar et al.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2016)
What Should Researchers Expect When They Replicate Studies? A Statistical View of Replicability in Psychological Science
Prasad Patil et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2016)
How scientists fool themselves - and how they can stop
Regina Nuzzo
NATURE (2015)
The fickle P value generates irreproducible results
Lewis G. Halsey et al.
NATURE METHODS (2015)
Does the P Value Have a Future in Plant Pathology?
L. V. Madden et al.
PHYTOPATHOLOGY (2015)
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Alexander A. Aarts et al.
SCIENCE (2015)
A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too)
Joost C. F. de Winter et al.
PEERJ (2015)
Null hypothesis significance tests. A mix-up of two different theories: the basis for widespread confusion and numerous misinterpretations
Jesper W. Schneider
SCIENTOMETRICS (2015)
Is Psychology Suffering From a Replication Crisis? What Does Failure to Replicate Really Mean?
Scott E. Maxwell et al.
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST (2015)
Small Telescopes: Detectability and the Evaluation of Replication Results
Uri Simonsohn
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2015)
The Statistical Crisis in Science
Andrew Gelman et al.
AMERICAN SCIENTIST (2014)
Six Persistent Research Misconceptions
Kenneth J. Rothman
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE (2014)
Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis
John P. A. Ioannidis et al.
LANCET (2014)
P-values in genomics: Apparent precision masks high uncertainty
L. C. Lazzeroni et al.
MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY (2014)
Why Publishing Everything Is More Effective than Selective Publishing of Statistically Significant Results
Marcel A. L. M. van Assen et al.
PLOS ONE (2014)
Adaptive revised standards for statistical evidence
Luis Pericchi et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2014)
Revised evidence for statistical standards
Andrew Gelman et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2014)
Reproducibility issues in science, is P value really the only answer?
Jean Gaudart et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2014)
Reply to Gelman, Gaudart, Pericchi: More reasons to revise standards for statistical evidence
Valen E. Johnson
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2014)
On the persistence of low power in psychological science
Ivan Vankov et al.
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (2014)
How to Make More Published Research True
John P. A. Ioannidis
PLOS MEDICINE (2014)
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values
David Colquhoun
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2014)
Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors
Andrew Gelman et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2014)
Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results
Zoltan Dienes
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY (2014)
Expectations for Replications Are Yours Realistic?
David J. Stanley et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2014)
When decision heuristics and science collide
Erica C. Yu et al.
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2014)
Malignant side effects of null-hypothesis significance testing
Marc Branch
THEORY & PSYCHOLOGY (2014)
The New Statistics: Why and How
Geoff Cumming
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2014)
Do We Really Need the S-word?
Megan D. Higgs
AMERICAN SCIENTIST (2013)
How confidence intervals become confusion intervals
James McCormack et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2013)
Living with Statistics in Observational Research
Sander Greenland et al.
EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)
Reconciling Theory and Practice What Is to Be Done with P Values?
David A. Savitz
EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
Bjoern Brembs et al.
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE (2013)
Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias
Gregory Francis
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY (2013)
Interrogating p-values
Andrew Gelman
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY (2013)
Confidence and precision increase with high statistical power
Katherine S. Button et al.
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE (2013)
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Katherine S. Button et al.
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE (2013)
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias - An Updated Review
Kerry Dwan et al.
PLOS ONE (2013)
Revised standards for statistical evidence
Valen E. Johnson
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2013)
Why the Resistance to Statistical Innovations? Bridging the Communication Gap
Donald Sharpe
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2013)
Nonsignificance Plus High Power Does Not Imply Support for the Null Over the Alternative
Sander Greenland
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2012)
Confidence Intervals Make a Difference: Effects of Showing Confidence Intervals on Inferential Reasoning
Rink Hoekstra et al.
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT (2012)
Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
Daniele Fanelli
SCIENTOMETRICS (2012)
A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories: Publication Bias and Psychological Science's Aversion to the Null
Christopher J. Ferguson et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Subjective p Intervals Researchers Underestimate the Variability of p Values Over Replication
Jerry Lai et al.
METHODOLOGY-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH METHODS FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES (2012)
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
Leslie K. John et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
How Can Significance Tests Be Deinstitutionalized?
Marc Orlitzky
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS (2012)
P-Value Precision and Reproducibility
Dennis D. Boos et al.
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2011)
Issues in information theory-based statistical inference-a commentary from a frequentist's perspective
Roger Mundry
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY (2011)
Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: overestimated effect sizes and the winner's curse
Wolfgang Forstmeier et al.
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY (2011)
Magnitude of effects in clinical trials published in high-impact general medical journals
Konstantinos C. M. Siontis et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2011)
Bayes Factor Approaches for Testing Interval Null Hypotheses
Richard D. Morey et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2011)
False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant
Joseph P. Simmons et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2011)
Fisher, Neyman, and the Creation of Classical Statistics
Erich L. Lehmann
FISHER, NEYMAN, AND THE CREATION OF CLASSICAL STATISTICS (2011)
How reliable are scientific studies?
Marcus R. Munafo et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY (2010)
Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
F. Song et al.
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (2010)
Meta-research: The art of getting it wrong
John P. A. Ioannidisa
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2010)
Confidence intervals permit, but do not guarantee, better inference than statistical significance testing
Melissa Coulson et al.
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY (2010)
Final collapse of the Neyman-Pearson decision theoretic framework and rise of the neoFisherian
Stuart H. Hurlbert et al.
ANNALES ZOOLOGICI FENNICI (2009)
Bias in genetic association studies and impact factor
M. R. Munafo et al.
MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY (2009)
What is the probability of replicating a statistically significant effect?
Jeff Miller
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2009)
P-values are random variables
Duncan J. Murdoch et al.
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2008)
Why most discovered true associations are inflated
John P. A. Ioannidis
EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science
Neal S. Young et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2008)
Replication and p Intervals p Values Predict the Future Only Vaguely, but Confidence Intervals Do Much Better
Geoff Cumming
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2008)
A communication researchers' guide to null hypothesis significance testing and alternatives
Timothy R. Levine et al.
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH (2008)
Publication bias in empirical sociological research - Do arbitrary significance levels distort published results?
Alan S. Gerber et al.
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH (2008)
Inference by Eye: Pictures of Confidence Intervals and Thinking About Levels of Confidence
Geoff Cumming
TEACHING STATISTICS (2007)
Upward bias in odds ratio estimates from genome-wide association studies
Chad Garner
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY (2007)
Overcoming the winner's curse:: Estimating penetrance parameters from case-control data
Sebastian Zollner et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS (2007)
Probability as certainty:: Dichotomous thinking and the misuse of p values
Rink Hoekstra et al.
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2006)
The difference between significant and not significant is not itself statistically significant
Andrew Gelman et al.
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2006)
Impact of criticism of null-hypothesis significance testing on statistical reporting practices in conservation biology
Fiona Fidler et al.
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY (2006)
Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour?
Mark J. Whittingham et al.
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY (2006)
Models and statistical inference: The controversy between Fisher and Neyman-Pearson
J Lenhard
BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE (2006)
Misuse of statistical tests in Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology publications
P Schatz et al.
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY (2005)
Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research
JPA Ioannidis
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2005)
Gastrointestinal tolerability and effectiveness of rofecoxib versus naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis - A randomized, controlled trial
JR Lisse et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2003)
The p-value fallacy and how to avoid it
P Dixon
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE (2003)
Confusion over measures of evidence (p's) versus errors (a's) in classical statistical testing
R Hubbard et al.
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2003)
A survey of the statistical power of research in behavioral ecology and animal behavior
MD Jennions et al.
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY (2003)
Even statisticians are not immune to misinterpretations of null hypothesis significance tests
MP Lecoutre et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY (2003)
A comment on replication, p-values and evidence
S Senn
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2002)
Relationships fade with time: a meta-analysis of temporal trends in publication in ecology and evolution
MD Jennions et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES (2002)
Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: An integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests
WW Tryon
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2001)
Interpretation of significance levels by psychological researchers: The .05 cliff effect may be overstated
J Poitevineau et al.
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2001)
Large upward bias in estimation of locus-specific effects from genomewide scans
HHH Göring et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS (2001)
Calibration of p values for testing precise null hypotheses
T Sellke et al.
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2001)
Sifting the evidence - what's wrong with significance tests?
JAC Sterne et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2001)
Null hypothesis significance testing - On the survival of a flawed method
J Krueger
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST (2001)
Null hypothesis testing: Problems, prevalence, and an alternative
DR Anderson et al.
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT (2000)
Share Paper
