4.6 Article

Phenotypic and microRNA transcriptomic profiling of the MDA-MB-231 spheroid-enriched CSCs with comparison of MCF-7 microRNA profiling dataset

Journal

PEERJ
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3551

Keywords

Breast cancer; Cancer stem cells; MDA-MB-231; Next generation sequencing; Triple-negative breast cancer cells; MicroRNA; Spheroid culture

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation of Malaysia (MOSTI) [02-02-11-SF0125]
  2. UM High Impact Research (UM-MOHE HIR) [UM.C/625/1/HIR/MOHE/CHAN/01, A000001-50001, UM.C/625/1/HIR/MOHE/CHAN/14/1, H-50001-A000027]
  3. Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman Research Fund (UTARRF) [A6200/A23]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Breast cancer spheroids have been widely used as in vitro models of cancer stem cells (CSCs), yet little is known about their phenotypic characteristics and microRNAs (miRNAs) expression profiles. The objectives of this research were to evaluate the phenotypic characteristics of MDA-MB-231 spheroid-enriched cells for their CSCs properties and also to determine their miRNAs expression profile. Similar to our previously published MCF-7 spheroid, MDA-MB-231 spheroid also showed typical CSCs characteristics namely self-renewability, expression of putative CSCs-related surface markers and enhancement of drug resistance. From the miRNA profile, miR-15b, miR-34a, miR-148a, miR-628 and miR-196b were shown to be involved in CSCs-associated signalling pathways in both models of spheroids, which highlights the involvement of these miRNAs in maintaining the CSCs features. In addition, unique clusters of miRNAs namely miR-205, miR-181a and miR-204 were found in basal-like spheroid whereas miR-125, miR-760, miR-30c and miR-136 were identified in luminal-like spheroid. Our results highlight the roles of miRNAs as well as novel perspectives of the relevant pathways underlying spheroid-enriched CSCs in breast cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available