4.0 Article

Short-Term Effects of Early Switching to Ranibizumab or Aflibercept in Diabetic Macular Edema Cases With Non-Response to Bevacizumab

Journal

OPHTHALMIC SURGERY LASERS & IMAGING RETINA
Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages 230-236

Publisher

SLACK INC
DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20170301-06

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of early switching to ranibizumab (Lucentis; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) or aflibercept (Eylea; Regeneron, Tarrytown, NY) in cases of diabetic macular edema (DME) that have shown no response to bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study involving 59 eyes of 45 patients with DME previously treated with bevacizumab. Patients were switched either to ranibizumab or aflibercept. Detailed ophthalmological examination, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and optical coherence tomography (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) were performed prior to and 1 month post-switch. RESULTS: Fifty-nine eyes of 45 patients were included in the study, of whom 14 patients (17 eyes) were switched to aflibercept and 31 patients (42 eyes) were switched to ranibizumab. Post-switch, there was a statistically significant improvement in the BCVA in the combined group (aflibercept and ranibizumab), as well as in the ranibizumab group alone. In addition, there was a statistically significant decrease in the central subfield thickness (CST) in the combined group, as well as in the ranibizumab and aflibercept groups individually. There was no significant difference with regard to the change in macular thickness or BCVA between the aflibercept and ranibizumab groups. In addition, neither the preswitch central macular thickness, previous number of injections, nor the pre-switch visual acuity affected the response to switching. CONCLUSION: Aflibercept and ranibizumab both appear to be effective for patients showing no initial response to bevacizumab.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available