4.5 Article

The age-dependent effects of a single-dose methylphenidate challenge on cerebral perfusion in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Journal

NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages 123-129

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.11.021

Keywords

ADHD; Methylphenidate; Dopamine; Age; Cerebral blood flow; Arterial spin labeling

Categories

Funding

  1. Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam [11.25.017, 11.32050.26, ZoNMW:11.32050.26]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methylphenidate (MPH) is a stimulant drug and an effective treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in both children and adults. Pre-clinical studies suggest that the response to stimulants is dependent on age, which may reflect the ontogeny of the dopamine (DA) system, which continues to develop throughout childhood and adolescence. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the modulating effect of age on the cerebral blood flow (CBF) response to MPH in stimulant treatment-naive children and adults with ADHD. Ninety-eight stimulant treatment-naive male pediatric (10-12 years) and adult (23-40 years) patients with ADHD were included in this study. The CBF response to an acute challenge with MPH (0.5mg/kg) was measured using arterial spin labeling (ASL) pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging, as a proxy for DA function. Region-of-interest (ROI) analyses were carried out for the striatum, thalamus and medial prefrontal cortex and in addition voxel-wise analyses were conducted. An acute challenge with MPH decreased CBF in both children and adults in cortical areas, although to a greater extent in adults. In contrast, ROI analyses showed that MPH decreased thalamic CBF only in children, but not adults. Our findings highlight the importance of taking the developmental perspective into account when studying the effects of stimulants in ADHD patients. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available