4.7 Article

Impact of Temperature and UV Irradiation on Dynamics of NO2 Sensors Based on ZnO Nanostructures

Journal

NANOMATERIALS
Volume 7, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano7100312

Keywords

gas sensors; nanostructures; zinc oxide (ZnO); NO2 sensing mechanisms; photoactivation; ultraviolet (UV) activation

Funding

  1. Polish National Science Centre NCN [2012/07/B/ST7/01 471]
  2. Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering [BKM/563/Re4/2016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main object of this study is the improvement of the dynamics of NO2 sensors based on ZnO nanostructures. Investigations presented in this paper showed that the combination of temperature and ultraviolet (UV) activation of the sensors can significantly decrease the sensor response and regeneration times. In comparison with the single activation method (elevated temperature or UV), these times for 1 ppm of NO2 decreased from about 10 min (or more) to less than 40 s. In addition, at the optimal conditions (200 degrees C and UV), sensors were very stable, were fully scalable (in the range on NO2 concentration of 1-20 ppm) and baseline drift was significantly reduced. Furthermore, in this paper, extensive studies of the influence of temperature and carrier gas (nitrogen and air) on NO2 sensing properties of the ZnO nanostructures were conducted. The NO2 sensing mechanisms of the sensors operating at elevated temperatures and under UV irradiation were also discussed. Our study showed that sensor responses to NO2 and response/regeneration times are comparable from sensor to sensor in air and nitrogen conditions, which suggests that the proposed simple technology connected with well-chosen operation conditions is repeatable. The estimated limit of detection of the sensors is within the level of approximate to 800 ppb in nitrogen and approximate to 700 ppb in air.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available