4.6 Article

A Window of Opportunity for Cognitive Training in Adolescence

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 27, Issue 12, Pages 1620-1631

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0956797616671327

Keywords

adolescence; sensitive periods; cognitive development; learning; plasticity; cognitive training; education

Funding

  1. Royal Society University Research Fellowship
  2. Jacobs Foundation
  3. Nuffield Foundation
  4. University College London
  5. Cusanuswerk
  6. MRC [MC_UP_1401/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_1401/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the current study, we investigated windows for enhanced learning of cognitive skills during adolescence. Six hundred thirty-three participants (11-33 years old) were divided into four age groups, and each participant was randomly allocated to one of three training groups. Each training group completed up to 20 days of online training in numerosity discrimination (i.e., discriminating small from large numbers of objects), relational reasoning (i.e., detecting abstract relationships between groups of items), or face perception (i.e., identifying differences in faces). Training yielded some improvement in performance on the numerosity-discrimination task, but only in older adolescents or adults. In contrast, training in relational reasoning improved performance on that task in all age groups, but training benefits were greater for people in late adolescence and adulthood than for people earlier in adolescence. Training did not increase performance on the face-perception task for any age group. Our findings suggest that for certain cognitive skills, training during late adolescence and adulthood yields greater improvement than training earlier in adolescence, which highlights the relevance of this late developmental stage for education.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available