4.4 Article

Ribose operon repressor (RbsR) contributes to the adhesion of Aeromonas hydrophila to Anguilla japonica mucus

Journal

MICROBIOLOGYOPEN
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.451

Keywords

A; hydrophila; adhesion; intracellular survival; Mini-Tn10Km; rbsR

Categories

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Program of Xiamen Southern Oceanographic Center [14CZP032HJ06]
  2. Regional Demonstration of Marine Economy Innovative Development Project [14PYY050SF03, 12PYY001SF08]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31272699, 31502194]
  4. Science and Technology Major/Special Project of Fujian Province [2016NZ0001-3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The characterization of adhesion between pathogenic bacteria and the host is critical. Pathogenic Aeromonas hydrophila was shown to adhere in vitro to the mucus of Anguilla japonica. To further investigate the adhesion mechanisms of A.hydrophila, a mini-Tn10 transposon mutagenesis system was used to generate an insertion mutant library by cell conjugation. Seven mutants that were impaired in adhesion to mucus were selected out of 332 individual colonies, and mutant M196 was the most severely impaired strain. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) blast analysis showed that mutant M196 was inserted by mini-Tn10 with an ORF of approximately 1,005bp (GenBank accession numbers KP280172). This ORF is predicted to encode a protein consist of 334 amino acid, which displays the highest identity (98%) with the RbsR of A.hydrophila ATCC 7966. Random inactivation of rbsR gene affected the pleiotropic phenotypes of A.hydrophila. The adhesion ability and the survival level of the rbsR gene mutant (M196) were attenuated compared with the wild-type and rbsR complementary type. The findings of this study indicated that RbsR plays roles in the bacterial adhesion and intracellular survival of A.hydrophila.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available