4.5 Article

Deformation Behavior and Microstructure Evolution of NiTiCu Shape Memory Alloy Subjected to Plastic Deformation at High Temperatures

Journal

METALS
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/met7080294

Keywords

shape memory alloy; NiTiCu alloy; constitutive behavior; phase transformation; microstructure

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51475101, 51305091, 51305092]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deformation behavior and microstructure evolution of NiTiCu shape memory alloy (SMA), which possesses martensite phase at room temperature, were investigated based on a uniaxial compression test at the temperatures of 700 similar to 1000 degrees C and at the strain rates of 0.0005 similar to 0.5 s(-1). The constitutive equation of NiTiCu SMA was established in order to describe the flow characteristic of NiTiCu SMA, which is dominated by dynamic recovery and dynamic recrystallization. Dislocations become the dominant substructures of martensite phase in NiTiCu SMA compressed at 700 degrees C. Martensite twins are dominant in NiTiCu SMA compressed at 800 and 900 degrees C. Martensite twins are not observed in NiTiCu SMA compressed at 1000 degrees C. The microstructures resulting from dynamic recovery or dynamic recrystallization significantly influences the substructures in the martensite phase of NiTiCu SMA at room temperature. Dislocation substructures formed during dynamic recovery, such as dislocation cells and subgrain boundaries, can suppress the formation of twins in the martensite laths of NiTiCu SMA. The size of dynamic recrystallized grains affects the formation of martensite twins. Martensite twins are not easily formed in the larger recrystallized grain, since the constraint of the grain boundaries plays a weak role. However, in the smaller recrystallized grain, martensite twins are induced to accommodate the transformation from austenite to martensite.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available