4.6 Review

Use of bone turnover markers in postmenopausal osteoporosis

Journal

LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 11, Pages 908-923

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30184-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Amgen
  2. Alexion
  3. AstraZeneca
  4. Lily
  5. D3 Biomedical Science Institutes
  6. GSK Nutrition
  7. Immunodiagnostic Systems
  8. Roche
  9. Medical Research Council [MR/P020941/1, MR/K006312/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0513-10073] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. MRC [MR/K006312/1, MR/P020941/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bone turnover comprises two processes: the removal of old bone (resorption) and the laying down of new bone (formation). N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) and C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I) are markers of bone formation and resorption, respectively, that are recommended for clinical use. Bone turnover markers can be measured on several occasions in one individual with good precision. However, these markers are subject to several sources of variability, including feeding (resorption decreases) and recent fracture (all markers increase for several months). Bone turnover markers are not used for diagnosis of osteoporosis and do not improve prediction of bone loss or fracture within an individual. In untreated women, very high bone turnover marker concentrations suggest secondary causes of high bone turnover (eg, bone metastases or multiple myeloma). In people with osteoporosis, bone turnover markers might be useful to assess the response to anabolic and antiresorptive therapies, to assess compliance to therapy, or to indicate possible secondary osteoporosis. Much remains to be learnt about how bone turnover markers can be used to monitor the effect of stopping bisphosphonate therapy (eg, to identify a threshold above which restarting therapy should be considered). More studies are needed to investigate the use of bone turnover markers for assessment of the bone safety of new medications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available