4.7 Article

Stability analyses of vertically exposed cemented backfill: A revisit to Mitchell's physical model tests

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2016.09.024

Keywords

Cemented backfill; Required strength; Mitchell; Physical model tests; Numerical modeling; FLAC3D

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201406460041]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [NSERC 402318]
  3. Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauve en Sante et en Securite du Travail [IRSST 2013-0029]
  4. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec - Nature et Technologies [FRQNT 2015-MI-191676]
  5. Research Institute on Mines and Environment (RIME UQAT-Polytechnique)
  6. National Science and Technology Support Program of China [2013BAB02B02]
  7. Scientific Research Fund of Beijing General Research Institute of Mining and Metallurgy of China [YJ201507]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mitchell's solution is commonly used to determine the required strength of vertically exposed cemented backfill in mines. Developed for drained backfill, Mitchell model assumed a zero friction angle for the backfill. Physical model tests were performed. Good agreements were obtained between the required strengths predicted by the analytical solution and experimental results. However, it is well-known that zero friction angle can only be possible in terms of total stresses when geomaterials are submitted to unconsolidated and undrained conditions. A revisit to Mitchell's physical model tests reveals that both the laboratory tests performed for obtaining the shear strength parameters of the cemented backfill and the box stability tests were conducted under a condition close to undrained condition. This explains well the good agreement between Mitchell's solution and experimental results. Good agreements are equally obtained between Mitchell's experimental results and FLAC3D numerical modeling of short-term stability analyses of exposed cemented backfill. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of China University of Mining & Technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available