4.4 Article

Tunable Hydrogels from Pulmonary Extracellular Matrix for 3D Cell Culture

Journal

JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
Volume -, Issue 119, Pages -

Publisher

JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
DOI: 10.3791/55094

Keywords

Bioengineering; Issue 119; Lung; pulmonary; extracellular matrix; hydrogel; 3D scaffold; porcine; 3D cell culture; decellularization

Funding

  1. NIH-NINDS Center Core Grant [5 P30 NS047463]
  2. NIH-NCI Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA016059]
  3. National Science Foundation [CMMI 1351162]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here we present a method for establishing multiple component cell culture hydrogels for in vitro lung cell culture. Beginning with healthy en bloc lung tissue from porcine, rat, or mouse, the tissue is perfused and submerged in subsequent chemical detergents to remove the cellular debris. Histological comparison of the tissue before and after processing confirms removal of over 95% of double stranded DNA and alpha galactosidase staining suggests the majority of cellular debris is removed. After decellularization, the tissue is lyophilized and then cryomilled into a powder. The matrix powder is digested for 48 hr in an acidic pepsin digestion solution and then neutralized to form the pregel solution. Gelation of the pregel solution can be induced by incubation at 37 degrees C and can be used immediately following neutralization or stored at 4 degrees C for up to two weeks. Coatings can be formed using the pregel solution on a non-treated plate for cell attachment. Cells can be suspended in the pregel prior to self-assembly to achieve a 3D culture, plated on the surface of a formed gel from which the cells can migrate through the scaffold, or plated on the coatings. Alterations to the strategy presented can impact gelation temperature, strength, or protein fragment sizes. Beyond hydrogel formation, the hydrogel stiffness may be increased using genipin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available