4.4 Article

Pluripotent Stem Cell Derived Cardiac Cells for Myocardial Repair

Journal

JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
Volume -, Issue 120, Pages -

Publisher

JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
DOI: 10.3791/55142

Keywords

Developmental Biology; Issue 120; Heart; Heart failure; Pluripotent Stem Cells; Myocardium; Infarct; Cell therapy

Funding

  1. US Public Health Service grants NIH RO1s [HL67828, HL95077, HL114120, UO1 HL100407-project 4]
  2. American Heart Association Scientist Development Grant [16SDG30410018]
  3. Research Voucher Award from University of Alabama at Birmingham Center for Clinical and Translational Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) must be fully differentiated into specific cell types before administration, but conventional protocols for differentiating hiPSCs into cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs), endothelial cells (hiPSC-ECs), and smooth muscle cells (SMCs) are often limited by low yield, purity, and/or poor phenotypic stability. Here, we present novel protocols for generating hiPSC-CMs, -ECs, and -SMCs that are substantially more efficient than conventional methods, as well as a method for combining cell injection with a cytokine-containing patch created over the site of administration. The patch improves both the retention of the injected cells, by sealing the needle track to prevent the cells from being squeezed out of the myocardium, and cell survival, by releasing insulin-like growth factor (IGF) over an extended period. In a swine model of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury, the rate of engraftment was more than two-fold greater when the cells were administered with the cytokine-containing patch comparing to the cells without patch, and treatment with both the cells and the patch, but not with the cells alone, was associated with significant improvements in cardiac function and infarct size.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available