4.4 Article

Neonatal Murine Cochlear Explant Technique as an In Vitro Screening Tool in Hearing Research

Journal

JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
Volume -, Issue 124, Pages -

Publisher

JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
DOI: 10.3791/55704

Keywords

Medicine; Issue 124; Murine cochlear explant; organotypic culture; inner ear; outer hair cells; inner hair cells; spiral ganglion neurons; auditory synaptopathy; adeno-associated virus

Funding

  1. National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders [R01DC015824, T32DC00038]
  2. Department of Defense [W81XWH-15-1-0472]
  3. Bertarelli Foundation
  4. Nancy Sayles Day Foundation
  5. Lauer Tinnitus Research Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While there have been remarkable advances in hearing research over the past few decades, there is still no cure for Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SNHL), a condition that typically involves damage to or loss of the delicate mechanosensory structures of the inner ear. Sophisticated in vitro and ex vivo assays have emerged in recent years, enabling the screening of an increasing number of potentially therapeutic compounds while minimizing resources and accelerating efforts to develop cures for SNHL. Though homogenous cultures of certain cell types continue to play an important role in current research, many scientists now rely on more complex organotypic cultures of murine inner ears, also known as cochlear explants. The preservation of organized cellular structures within the inner ear facilitates the in situ evaluation of various components of the cochlear infrastructure, including inner and outer hair cells, spiral ganglion neurons, neurites, and supporting cells. Here we present the preparation, culture, treatment, and immunostaining of neonatal murine cochlear explants. The careful preparation of these explants facilitates the identification of mechanisms that contribute to SNHL and constitutes a valuable tool for the hearing research community.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available