4.4 Article

Microfluidic Dry-spinning and Characterization of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Fibers

Journal

JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
Volume -, Issue 127, Pages -

Publisher

JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
DOI: 10.3791/56271

Keywords

Chemistry; Issue 127; Dry-spinning; biomimetic; regenerated silk fibroin fiber; microfluidic; structure; synchrotron radiation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21674018]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0201702 /2016YFA0201700]
  3. Shuguang Program - Shanghai Education Development Foundation
  4. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [15SG30]
  5. DHU Distinguished Young Professor Program [A201302]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  7. 111 Project [111-2-04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The protocol demonstrates a method for mimicking the spinning process of silkworm. In the native spinning process, the contracting spinning duct enables the silk proteins to be compact and ordered by shearing and elongation forces. Here, a biomimetic microfluidic channel was designed to mimic the specific geometry of the spinning duct of the silkworm. Regenerated silk fibroin (RSF) spinning doped with high concentration, was extruded through the microchannel to dry-spin fibers at ambient temperature and pressure. In the post-treated process, the as-spun fibers were drawn and stored in ethanol aqueous solution. Synchrotron radiation wide-angle X-ray diffraction (SR-WAXD) technology was used to investigate the microstructure of single RSF fibers, which were fixed to a sample holder with the RSF fiber axis normal to the microbeam of the X-ray. The crystallinity, crystallite size, and crystalline orientation of the fiber were calculated from the WAXD data. The diffraction arcs near the equator of the two-dimensional WAXD pattern indicate that the post-treated RSF fiber has a high orientation degree.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available