4.7 Article

Novel nitrogen enriched porous carbon adsorbents for CO2 capture: Breakthrough adsorption study

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 346-356

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2015.11.017

Keywords

Nitrogen enriched carbon; Nanocasting; CO2 adsorption; Kinetics; Isotherm

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi
  2. DST-INSPIRE under its Assured Opportunity for Research Careers (AORC) scheme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A range of novel nitrogen enriched porous carbons were obtained by varying carbonization temperature from 500 to 800 degrees C using nanocasting technique. Hexamethoxymethylmelamine (HMMM) and mesoporous silica were used as carbon precursor and template respectively. Prepared porous carbons were evaluated for their textural and chemical properties followed by CO2 adsorption-desorption performance by conducting breakthrough experiments. Evolution of nitrogen functionalities in carbon materials during the carbonization process was investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Porous carbons obtained at 700 degrees C showed the best textural properties among the prepared carbons. It exhibited the specific surface area of 463 m(2)/g and total pore volume of 0.48 cm(3)/g and showed equilibrium adsorption capacity of 0.676 mmol/g at 30 degrees C and 12.5% CO2 concentration. The adsorption capacity of C-700 was found to decrease with increase in adsorption temperature while it increased with increase in inlet CO2 concentration. CO2 adsorption kinetics on the prepared carbons was explained by pseudo-first order adsorption model. Three isotherm models were used to investigate the CO2 adsorption equilibrium data and among the studied models Temkin isotherm model was found to explain the equilibrium data suggesting the heterogeneous nature of carbon surface. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available