4.7 Article

Continuous photosynthetic abatement of CO2 and volatile organic compounds from exhaust gas coupled to wastewater treatment: Evaluation of tubular algal-bacterial photobioreactor

Journal

JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages 353-359

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2017.07.016

Keywords

Carbon dioxide; Centrate; Exhaust gas; Microalgae; Toluene; Tubular photobioreactor

Funding

  1. EU COST action-W2020 [ES1202-010715-062360]
  2. Stifelson Tandlakare Gustaf stipendium of Malardalen University
  3. CONACyT-Mexico [Reg: 237873]
  4. Regional Government of Castilla y Leon [UIC71]
  5. MINECO (Red Novedar)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The continuous abatement of CO2 and toluene from the exhaust gas by an indigenous microalgal-bacterial consortium was investigated in a pilot tubular photobioreactor interconnected to an absorption column using diluted centrate in seawater as a free nutrient source. The removal efficiency of CO2 and toluene was maximised in the vertical absorption column by identifying an optimum liquid to gas (L/G) ratio of 15. The photobioreactor supported steady-state nitrogen and phosphorus removals of 91 +/- 2% and 95 +/- 4% using 15% diluted centrate at 14 and 7 d of hydraulic retention time (HRT), respectively. A decrease in the removal efficiencies of nitrogen (36 +/- 5%) and phosphorus (58 +/- 10%) was recorded when using 30% diluted centrate at 7 d of HRT. The volumetric biomass productivities obtained at an HRT of 7 d accounted for 42 +/- 11 and 80 +/- 3 mg TSS L-1 d(-1) using 15 and 30% centrate, respectively. Stable CO2 (76 +/- 7%) and toluene removals (89 +/- 5%) were achieved at an L/G ratio of 15 regardless of the HRT or centrate dilution. Hence, this study demonstrated the potential of algal-bacterial systems for the continuous removal of CO2 and volatile organic compounds from exhaust gas coupled with the simultaneous treatment of centrate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available