4.3 Article

Disease-weather relationships for wheat powdery mildew under climate change in China

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE
Volume 155, Issue 8, Pages 1239-1252

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0021859617000442

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Meteorological Key Technology Integration and Application Program of China [CMAGJ2015Z02]
  2. Meteorological Public Welfare Profession of China [GYHY201006026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Little is known about the quantitative relationships between wheat powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f.sp. tritici) epidemics and climatic variables at the provincial scale in China, particularly under climate change. The present study assesses the actual disease process and corresponding impact on wheat yield and addresses climatic-driven variables that affect a powdery mildew epidemic. Powdery mildew increased in frequency from 1981 to 2010, and wheat yield decreased in most regions. It was clear that differences in disease and yield loss occurred temporally and spatially. Although particular weather variables were positively or negatively related to the disease, multiple stepwise regression analysis indicated that mostly fewer than three variables affected prevalence and severity of powdery mildew in each province. In most cases, some combination of higher temperature, humidity, rainfall and wind led to higher disease severity. These weather factors had different effects on disease development. The influence of climatic variables on powdery mildew tended to decrease from 1981 to 2010, whereas the effect of non-climatic factors increased and was attributed mainly to the use of fungicides and resistant cultivars. Therefore, the results of the current study suggest that wheat powdery mildew in China will not increase consistently in the future. In addition, the quantitative assessment method used in the current study can generally provide a good way to identify disease epidemics under climate change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available