3.8 Proceedings Paper

Real-time forecasts of flood hazard and impact: some UK experiences

Publisher

E D P SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20160718015

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Centre of Expertise for Waters (CREW) in Scotland
  2. Joint Defra/EA/NRW (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs/Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales)
  3. SEPA
  4. Go Science
  5. National Capability Programme of the Centre for Ecology Hydrology
  6. Flood Forecasting Centre
  7. Natural Resources Wales
  8. Scottish Flood Forecasting Service
  9. Environment Agency
  10. Met Office

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Major UK floods over the last decade have motivated significant technological and scientific advances in operational flood forecasting and warning. New joint forecasting centres between the national hydrological and meteorological operating agencies have been formed that issue a daily, national Flood Guidance Statement (FGS) to the emergency response community. The FGS is based on a Flood Risk Matrix approach that is a function of potential impact severity and likelihood. It has driven an increased demand for robust, accurate and timely forecast and alert information on fluvial and surface water flooding along with impact assessments. The Grid-to-Grid (G2G) distributed hydrological model has been employed across Britain at a 1km resolution to support the FGS. Novel methods for linking dynamic gridded estimates of river flow and surface runoff with more detailed offline flood risk maps have been developed to obtain real-time probabilistic forecasts of potential impacts, leading to operational trials. Examples of the national-scale G2G application are provided along with case studies of forecast flood impact from (i) an operational Surface Water Flooding (SWF) trial during the Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth Games, (ii) SWF developments under the Natural Hazards Partnership over England & Wales, and (iii) fluvial applications in Scotland.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available