4.7 Article

hhjj production at the LHC

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
Volume 75, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3622-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Mainz Institute for Theoretical Physics (MITP)
  2. Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology Associateship programme
  3. University of Glasgow College of Science and Engineering
  4. European Commission through Higgs Tools Initial Training Network [PITN-GA-2012-316704]
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000466/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. STFC [ST/L000466/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The search for di-Higgs production at the LHC in order to set limits on the Higgs trilinear coupling and constraints on new physics is one of the main motivations for the LHC high-luminosity phase. Recent experimental analyses suggest that such analyses will only be successful if information from a range of channels is included. We therefore investigate di-Higgs production in association with two hadronic jets and give a detailed discussion of both the gluonand the weak boson-fusion (WBF) contributions, with a particular emphasis on the phenomenology with modified Higgs trilinear and quartic gauge couplings. We perform a detailed investigation of the full hadronic final state and find that hhjj production should add sensitivity to a di-Higgs search combination at the HL-LHC with 3 ab(-1). Since the WBF and GF contributions are sensitive to different sources of physics beyond the Standard Model, we devise search strategies to disentangle and isolate these production modes. While gluon fusion remains non-negligible in WBF-type selections, sizeable new physics contributions to the latter can still be constrained. As an example of the latter point we investigate the sensitivity that can be obtained for a measurement of the quartic Higgs-gauge boson couplings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available