3.8 Proceedings Paper

Using HEC-FIA to identify Indirect Economic Losses

The United States Army Corps of Engineers' Hydrologic Engineering Center developed the HEC-FIA (Flood Impact Analysis) software to assist in the estimation of consequences with uncertainty. By estimating the consequences, the benefits of existing and future flood risk management measures can be evaluated and compared. HEC-FIA utilizes geospatial datasets to help users build structure inventories and assign values and population per structure. Using this information and geospatially derived flood depth grids (provided by most hydraulic models), HEC-FIA estimates direct economic, indirect economic, agricultural, and life loss consequences for flood hazards. HEC-FIA can compute results for a single event in either deterministic mode or in uncertainty mode which utilizes a Monte Carlo approach. The user can define the uncertainties about any structure in the floodplain in many ways, and each has various impacts on the different consequence calculations. For example, foundation heights, structure values, and depth-damage relationships impact economic consequences, while foundation heights, warning issuance times, and fatality rates impact the life loss calculations. All of these parameters can be defined with uncertainty. HEC-FIA can also be linked into HEC-WAT (Watershed Analysis Tool) with the FRA (Flood Risk Analysis) compute option to randomize the hydraulic events being evaluated in HEC-FIA so that hydrologic, hydraulic, geotechnical, and economic uncertainties can all be represented and evaluated by alternative within the floodplain. This paper will describe how HEC-FIA can be utilized to help evaluate the indirect economic consequences for various alternatives within a floodplain. The computational methods for indirect economic losses utilize a Computable General Equilibrium model to describe the secondary and tertiary impacts of loss of service, loss of laborers, and reductions in demand for intermediary goods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available