4.6 Article

Efficient and selective removal of radioactive iodine anions using engineered nanocomposite membranes

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-NANO
Volume 4, Issue 11, Pages 2157-2163

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7en00759k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) as the Environmental Health Action Program [2016001360012]
  2. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2017R1C1B1007040]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1C1B1007040] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The efficient treatment of radioactive waste arising from nuclear accidents and overuse of radioisotopes has become an important issue, and much effort has been devoted to protecting the environment from such toxic radioactive materials. Among them, radioactive iodine in water is regarded as one of the most palpable threats to humans, as it is generated by post-use in medical and industrial applications. Although a few adsorbents and purification processes have been reported, the development of a better desalination method that is able to provide high removal efficiency, ion-selectivity, and reusability is still in demand. Herein, we report a hybrid composite membrane, composed of gold nanoparticles and cellulose acetate membranes, which has the potential to be used for efficient desalination of radioactive iodine. A single filtration process using this membrane provided high removal efficiency with more than two orders of magnitude iodide anion removal within a minute and excellent ion-selectivity. Moreover, the same operation can be applied several times without significant decrease of its performance. Therefore, it is anticipated that our work will be a new avenue for desalination of radioactive iodine in various aqueous media.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available