Journal
UNIVERSITAS PSYCHOLOGICA
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 117-127Publisher
PONTIFICA UNIV JAVERIANA, FAC PSYCH
DOI: 10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-1.eaie
Keywords
Immigration; acculturation; ethnic identity
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Under a not experimental, analytical cross-sectional desing, this study describes the relation between the acculturation strategies introduced by Berry, integration, assimilation, separation and marginalization, with the ethnic identity. Data was collected from 431 peruvians and colombians immigrants in the city of Antofagasta, Chile, using the acculturation scale developed by Basabe, Zlobina and Paez, (2004) and the spanish version of the Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM). The results concludes that biculturality was the most used acculturation strategy for both groups although differences were found for sex. For ethnic identity, differences were statistically significant for both groups only between nationalities. Analysing the existent relation between the variables, the tests concludes in favor for theoretical assumptions that people who choose for a loyalty to ingroup acculturation strategy (biculturals and separated) has a higher positive orientation to his/her own ethnic group, instead people who use a individualistic strategy (assimilated and marginated).
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available