4.1 Article

Comparing the predictive accuracy of frailty, comorbidity, and disability for mortality: a 1-year follow-up in patients hospitalized in geriatric wards

Journal

CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages 293-304

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S124342

Keywords

frailty; comorbidity; disability; hospitalized geriatric patients; older people; health status; survival

Funding

  1. Robert Bosch Foundation
  2. Austrian Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology (Walter Doberauer Scholarship)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Studies evaluating and comparing the power of frailty, comorbidity, and disability instruments, together and in parallel, for predicting mortality are limited. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the measures of frailty, comorbidity, and disability in predicting 1-year mortality in geriatric inpatients. Design: Prospective cohort study. Patients and setting: A total of 307 inpatients aged >= 65 years in geriatric wards of a general hospital participated in the study. Measurements: The patients were evaluated in relation to different frailty, comorbidity, and disability instruments during their hospital stays. These included three frailty (the seven-category Clinical Frailty Scale [CFS-7], a 41-item frailty index [FI], and the FRAIL scale), two comorbidity (the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics [CIRS-G] and the comorbidity domain of the FI [Comorbidity-D-FI]), and two disability instruments (disability in basic activities of daily living [ADL-Katz] and the instrumental and basic activities of daily living domains of the FI [IADL/ADL-D-FI]). The patients were followed-up over 1 year. Results: Using FI, CIRS-G, Comorbidity-D-FI, and ADL-Katz, this study identified a patient group with a high (>= 50%) 1-year mortality rate in all of the patients and the two patient subgroups (ie, patients aged 65-82 years and >= 83 years). The CFS-7, FI, FRAIL scale, CIRS-G, Comorbidity-D-FI, and IADL/ADL-D-FI (analyzed as full scales) revealed useful discriminative accuracy for 1-year mortality (ie, an area under the curve >0.7) in all the patients and the two patient subgroups (all P<0.001). Thereby, CFS-7 (in all patients and the two patient subgroups) and FI (in the subgroup of patients aged >= 83 years) showed greater discriminative accuracy for 1-year mortality compared to other instruments (all P<0.05). Conclusion: All the different instruments emerged as suitable tools for risk stratification in geriatric inpatients. Among them, CFS-7, and in those patients aged >= 83 years, also the FI, might most accurately predict 1-year mortality in the aforementioned group of individuals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available