4.5 Article

Synthesis of Robust Silicon Nanoparticles@Void@Graphitic Carbon Spheres for High-Performance Lithium-Ion-Battery Anodes

Journal

CHEMELECTROCHEM
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages 1463-1469

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/celc.201700173

Keywords

silicon nanoparticles; graphitic carbon spheres; composite hollow spheres; anode materials; lithium-ion batteries

Funding

  1. tional Natural Science Foundation of China [51602057, 51673041, 51322307, 51273218, 51133001, 21374018]
  2. Shu Guang project - Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [14SG04]
  3. Shu Guang project - Shanghai Education Development Foundation [14SG04]
  4. Shanghai talent development fund [201643]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016 M591602]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Silicon is known to be a promising candidate anode material for lithium-ion batteries because of its ultrahigh capacity; however, its volume expansion/shrinkage during lithiation/delithiation reactions represent the biggest challenge in practical applications. In this paper, we successfully design and synthesize a new type of robust silicon nanoparticles@void@graphitic carbon spheres (Si@void@C) material to buffer the silicon volume changes in the cyclic lithiation/delithiation process. The as-obtained Si@void@C nanocomposite spheres with well-dispersed silicon nanoparticles, efficient void spaces, and graphitic carbon shells can endow this nanocomposite anode with the robustness to solve the volume expansion/shrinkage issue. As demonstrated by coin battery performances, the Si@void@C nanocomposite sphere-based anode exhibits a specific capacity retention of 1565 and 1260 mAhg(-1) at C/5 and C/2 (1C=4200 mAg(-1)), respectively, after 1000 cycles of deep charge/discharge processes (voltage between 0.01 and 2.7 V versus Li/Li+). It provides a promising anode for a safe and high-performance Si-based materials in high-performance lithium-ion batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available