4.6 Article

The impact of comorbidity on mortality in multiple myeloma: a Danish nationwide population-based study

Journal

CANCER MEDICINE
Volume 6, Issue 7, Pages 1807-1816

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1128

Keywords

Comorbidity; international classification of diseases; multiple myeloma; prognosis; survival

Categories

Funding

  1. Danish Cancer Society
  2. The Danish Cancer Society [R94-A5689] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To describe the prevalence of comorbidity and its impact on survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients compared with population controls. Cases of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma during the 2005-2012 period were identified in the Danish National Multiple Myeloma Registry. For each myeloma patient, 10 members of the general population matched by age and sex were chosen from the national Civil Registration System. Data on comorbidity in the myeloma patients and the general population comparison cohort were collected by linkage to the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the prognostic significance of comorbidity. The study included 2190 cases of multiple myeloma and 21,900 population controls. The comorbidity was increased in multiple myeloma patients compared with population controls, odds ratio (OR) 1.4 (1.1-1.7). The registration of comorbidity was highly increased within the year preceding diagnosis of multiple myeloma (OR 3.0 [2.5-3.5]), which was attributable to an increased registration of various diseases, in particular, renal disease with OR 11.0 (8.1-14.9). The median follow-up time from diagnosis of multiple myeloma for patients alive was 4.3years (interquartile range 2.4-6.3). Patients with registered comorbidity had increased mortality compared with patients without comorbidity, hazard ratio 1.6 (1.5-1.8). Multiple myeloma patients have increased comorbidity compared with the background population, in particular during the year preceding the diagnosis of myeloma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available