4.6 Article

Development and validation of a nomogram predicting the overall survival of stage IV breast cancer patients

Journal

CANCER MEDICINE
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages 2586-2594

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1224

Keywords

Breast cancer; NCDB; nomogram; overall survival; prediction; prognosis; stage IV

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81402201, 81372817]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2014A030310070]
  3. Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Molecular Mechanism and Translational Medicine of Guangzhou Bureau of Science and Information Technology [[2013] 163]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to develop a nomogram to predict the overall survival (OS) of stage IV breast cancer patients. We searched the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for stage IV breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2013. Predictors of OS were identified and a nomogram was developed and validated using concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, and risk group stratifications. A total of 7199 patients from the NCDB were included in the study. With a median follow-up of 25.7months, the 1-year and 3-year OS rates were 80.6% and 52.5%, respectively. Race, age, comorbidity status, T-stage, grade, ER/PR/Her2 status, the presence of lung/liver/brain metastasis, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were significantly associated with OS. The developed nomogram had a C-index of 0.722 (95% CI 0.710-0.734) and 0.725 (95% CI 0.713-0.736) in the training and the validation cohorts, respectively. The predicted survival using the nomogram is well correlated with actual OS. The nomogram was able to stratify patients into different risk groups, among which the survival benefit of local therapy varied. We developed a nomogram to predict the overall survival of stage IV breast cancer patients. Prospectively designed studies with international collaborations are needed to further validate our nomogram.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available