4.3 Article

Outage analysis in two-way communication with RF energy harvesting relay and co-channel interference

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ett.3233

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study of relays with the scope of energy harvesting (EH) looks interesting as a means of enabling sustainable, wireless communication without the need to recharge or replace the battery driving the relays. However, the reliability of such communication systems becomes an important design challenge when such relays scavenge energy from the information bearing radio-frequency signals received from the source, using the technique of simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT). To this aim, this work studies bidirectional communication in a decode-and-forward (DF) relay-assisted cooperative wireless network in the presence of co-channel interference (CCI). In order to quantify the reliability of the bidirectional communication systems, a closed-form expression for the outage probability of the system is derived for both power splitting (PS) and time switching (TS) modes of operation of the relay. Simulation results are used to validate the accuracy of our analytical results and illustrate the dependence of the outage probability on various system parameters, like PS factor, TS factor and distance of the relay from both of the users. The results of performance comparison between PS relaying (PSR) and TS relaying (TSR) schemes are also presented. Besides, simulation results are also used to illustrate the spectral efficiency and the energy efficiency of the proposed system. The results show that, in terms of both spectral efficiency and energy efficiency, the two-way communication system in the presence of moderate CCI power, performs better than the similar system without CCI. Additionally, it is also found that PSR is superior to TSR protocol in terms of peak energy efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available