4.6 Article

Social-Ecological Dynamics of Ecosystem Services: Livelihoods and the Functional Relation between Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand-Evidence from Socotra Archipelago, Yemen and the Sahel Region, West Africa

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su9071037

Keywords

dynamics of use; ecosystem services; social-ecological system; spatial and temporal dynamics; supply and demand

Funding

  1. LOEWE programme of State of Hesse
  2. Environment Protection Authority Socotra
  3. GEF [5347]
  4. German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) [01UV1007A/B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In aiming to halt global biodiversity loss, it is essential to address underlying societal processes. The concept of ecosystem services claims to bridge between biodiversity and society. At the same time there is a considerable research gap regarding how ecosystem services are provided, and how societal activities and dynamics influence the provision of ecosystem services. Interactions and dependencies between ecosystem services supply and demand come to the fore but context-specific dynamics have largely been neglected. This article is a critical reflection on the current research of ecosystem services supply and demand. We argue that there is a functional relation between the supply and demand for ecosystem services, with the two influencing each other. Scientific interest should focus on both the temporal and spatial dynamics of ecosystem services supply and demand. Presenting two studies from Socotra Archipelago, Yemen and the Sahel regions in Senegal and Mali, West Africa, we illustrate that the society behind the demand for ecosystem services is highly interrelated with ecosystem services supply. We thus advocate the adoption of a social-ecological perspective for current research on ecosystem services supply and demand in order to address these context-specific temporal and spatial dynamics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available