4.5 Article

Endovascular ultrasound for renal sympathetic denervation in patients with therapy-resistant hypertension not responding to radiofrequency renal sympathetic denervation

Journal

EUROINTERVENTION
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages E282-E289

Publisher

EUROPA EDITION
DOI: 10.4244/EIJV12I2A43

Keywords

non-responders; radiofrequency; renal sympathetic denervation; resistant hypertension; ultrasound

Funding

  1. Medtronic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: Recent studies have reported a considerable number of non-responders after renal sympathetic de-nervation (RSD) with radiofrequency technology. Here we report our results of repeat RSD using ultrasound in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort study was performed in patients who underwent ultrasound RSD after non-response to RSD with radiofrequency. Non-response was defined as mean daytime systolic blood pressure >= 140 mmHg and/or a reduction of <= 10 mmHg in ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) >= 6 months after radiofrequency denervation. ABPM was recorded at baseline, post radiofrequency RSD as well as at three and six months post ultrasound RSD. A total of 24 non-responders underwent retreatment with the ultrasound device at a mean 15.3 +/- 8.2 months after radiofrequency RSD. Ultrasound RSD was performed successfully in all patients without severe adverse events. Mean daytime systolic blood pressure changed from 161.7 +/- 14.6 mmHg at baseline to 158.5 +/- 9.5 mmHg post radiofrequency RSD and to 150.5 +/- 10.4 mmHg and 151.6 +/- 11.0 mmHg at three and six months, respectively, post ultrasound RSD (p<0.01 with repeated measures analysis of variance). The main results of post hoc testing were as follows: baseline versus post radiofrequency RSD, p=0.83; baseline versus three months post ultrasound RSD, p=0.01; and baseline versus six months post ultrasound RSD, p=0.04. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound RSD appears to be safe and an effective therapeutic approach in patients not responding to previous RSD with radiofrequency technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available