4.5 Article

The use of herbs against neglected diseases: Evaluation of in vitro leishmanicidal and trypanocidal activity of Stryphnodendron rotundifolium Mart

Journal

SAUDI JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 1136-1141

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.03.001

Keywords

Stryphnodendron rotundifolium Mart; Trypanocidal; Leishmanicidal; Cytotoxicity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The evaluation of the leishmanicidal and trypanocidal activity of the hydroalcoholic extract of the bark of Stryphnodendron rotundifolium Mart. (EHCSR) was carried out to find an alternative treatment for parasitic diseases. EHCSR was prepared and used at four different concentrations (1000, 500, 250, 125 mu g/mL) in in vitro assays for activity against Leishmania promastigotes using the species Leishmania brasiliensis and Leishmania infantum and for trypanocidal activity using the epimastigotes of Trypanosoma cruzi. We also tested EHCSR for cytotoxicity against adhered cultured Murine J774 fibroblasts. The tests were performed in triplicate, and the percent mortality of parasites, IC50 and percent toxicity were determined. With regard to anti-leishmania activity against L. infantum, there was a mean mortality of 45% at all concentrations, and against L. brasiliensis, a substantial effect was seen at 1000 mu g/mL with 56.38% mortality, where the IC50 values were 1338.76 and 987.35 mu g/mL, respectively. Trypanocidal activity was notably high at 1000 mu g/mL extract with 82.31% mortality of epimastigotes. Cytotoxicity at the highest extract concentrations of 500 and 1000 mu g/mL was respectively 75.12% and 94.14%, with IC50 = 190.24 mu g/mL. Despite that the extract has anti-parasitic activity, its substantial cytotoxicity against fibroblasts cells makes its systemic use nonviable as a therapeutic alternative. (C) 2015 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available