4.8 Article

Post ionized defect engineering of the screen-printed Bi2Te2.7Se0.3 thick film for high performance flexible thermoelectric generator

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 31, Issue -, Pages 258-263

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.034

Keywords

Screen-printed Bi2Te2.7Se0.3 film; Post ionized defect engineering; Hydrogen annealing; Bismuth antisite defect

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean Government (MSIP) [NRF-2015RIA5A1036133]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flexible thermoelectric generators (f-TEGs), fabricated by the screen printing technique, have been introduced as a semi-permanent power source for wearable and flexible electronic systems. However, the output power density of the f-TEG module is still limited due to the low ZT of the screen-printed thermoelectric (TE) film. We herein report a post ionized defect engineering process that effectively controls ionized defects and improves the ZT value of a screen-printed ternary TE film. It was found that post annealing in a forming gas ambient (4% H-2+96% Ar) can reduce the nano- and micro-bismuth oxide particles in screen-printed n-type BiTeSe films, resulting in a bismuth rich condition and creation of bismuth antisite defects. We achieved a maximum ZT of 0.90 with the-screen-printed n-type BiTeSe thick film at-room temperature, which is-almost comparable to that of the bulk Bi2Te2.7Se0.3 and is a 2-fold increase over the same screen-printed film without the hydrogen ambient annealing. To demonstrate the applicability of this approach, a f-TEG device with 72 TE pairs (p-type Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3, forming gas annealed n-type Bi2Te2.7Se0.3) was fabricated by the screen printing technique. The device generated a high output power of 6.32 mW cm(-2) at Delta T=25.6 degrees C. These results demonstrate the feasibility of high performance and large-scale f-TEG fabrication using ionized-defect engineering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available