4.8 Article

Elucidating the reaction mechanism of SnF2@C nanocomposite as a high-capacity anode material for Na-ion batteries

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 42, Issue -, Pages 106-114

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.036

Keywords

Sodium-ion batteries; Anode; SnF2; Composite electrode; Reaction mechanism; X-ray absorption

Funding

  1. KIST Institutional Program [2E27090, 2V05540]
  2. Ministry of Science & ICT (MSIT), Republic of Korea [2E27090] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sn-based materials have drawn great attention as anodes for rechargeable batteries because of their extremely high theoretical energy storage capacities. Herein, a nanocomposite based on SnF2 and acetylene black is proposed as a high-performance anode material for sodium-ion batteries and their electrochemical performances, as well as related energy storage mechanism, are investigated. The nanocomposite electrode delivered a high reversible capacity of 563 mAh g(-1) which is considerably improved compared to a reversible capacity of 323 mAh g(-1) of the micron-sized bare SnF2 electrode. The nanocomposite electrode shows superior rate capability and delivers a reversible capacity of 191 mAh g(-1) at a high current density of 1 C, while the bare electrode delivers negligible capacities. The changes in crystallographic structure are observed using in-situ XRD and the results reveal the existence of a solid solution of two or more species during dis/charging. The electronic and atomic configurations depending on the state of dis/charging are systematically investigated using ex-situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy. The results reveal that the valence change of Sn follows the conversion (SnF2 + 2Na -> Sn + 2NaF) and alloying (Sn + XNa -> SnNaX) reaction upon sodium insertion into a composite.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available