4.4 Article

Evidence of activation of the Nrf2 pathway in multiple sclerosis patients treated with delayed-release dimethyl fumarate in the Phase 3 DEFINE and CONFIRM studies

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
Volume 23, Issue 14, Pages 1875-1883

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458517690617

Keywords

Dimethyl fumarate; monomethyl fumarate; Nrf2 pathway; HO1; NQO1; antioxidant response

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is an approved oral treatment for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Preclinical studies demonstrated that DMF activated the nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) pathway. DMF and its primary metabolite monomethyl fumarate (MMF) were also shown to promote cytoprotection of cultured central nervous system (CNS) cells via the Nrf2 pathway. Objective: To investigate the activation of Nrf2 pathway following ex vivo stimulation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with DMF or MMF, and in DMF-treated patients from two Phase 3 relapsing MS studies DEFINE and CONFIRM. Methods: Transcription of Nrf2 target genes NADPH:quinone oxidoreductase-1 (NQO1) and heme-oxygenase-1 (HO1) was measured using Taqman (R) assays. RNA samples were isolated from ex vivo-stimulated PBMCs and from whole blood samples of 200 patients each from placebo, twice daily (BID) and three times daily (TID) treatments. Results: DMF and MMF induced NQO1 and HO1 gene expression in ex vivo-stimulated PBMCs, DMF being the more potent inducer. Induction of NQO1 occurred at lower DMF concentrations compared to that of HO1. In DMF-treated patients, a statistically significant induction of NQO1 was observed relative to baseline and compared to placebo. No statistical significance was reached for HO1 induction. Conclusion: These data provide the first evidence of Nrf2 pathway activation from two large pivotal Phase 3 studies of DMF-treated MS patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available