4.4 Article

Remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of fatigue in multiple sclerosis: Results from a randomized, sham-controlled trial

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages 1760-1769

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458517732842

Keywords

Fatigue; multiple sclerosis; telerehabilitation; transcranial direct current stimulation; tDCS; tES

Funding

  1. Lourie Foundation, Inc.
  2. National MS Society Pilot Grant [PP-1411-02021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Fatigue is a common and debilitating feature of multiple sclerosis (MS) that remains without reliably effective treatment. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising option for fatigue reduction. We developed a telerehabilitation protocol that delivers tDCS to participants at home using specially designed equipment and real-time supervision (remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (RS-tDCS)). Objective: To evaluate whether tDCS can reduce fatigue in individuals with MS. Methods: Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex left anodal tDCS was administered using a RS-tDCS protocol, paired with 20 minutes of cognitive training. Here, two studies are considered. Study 1 delivered 10 open-label tDCS treatments (1.5 mA; n = 15) compared to a cognitive training only condition (n = 20). Study 2 was a randomized trial of active (2.0 mA, n = 15) or sham (n = 12) delivered for 20 sessions. Fatigue was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Fatigue Short Form. Results and conclusion: In Study 1, there was modest fatigue reduction in the active group (-2.5 +/- 7.4 vs -0.2 +/- 5.3, p = 0.30, Cohen's d = -0.35). However, in Study 2 there was statistically significant reduction for the active group (-5.6 +/- 8.9 vs 0.9 +/- 1.9, p = 0.02, Cohen's d = -0.71). tDCS is a potential treatment for MS-related fatigue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available